


{"id":40599,"date":"2020-02-02T10:22:53","date_gmt":"2020-02-02T10:22:53","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/topic\/fluent-multiple-sliding-mesh-model-setup-queries\/"},"modified":"2020-02-02T10:22:53","modified_gmt":"2020-02-02T10:22:53","slug":"fluent-multiple-sliding-mesh-model-setup-queries","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/fluent-multiple-sliding-mesh-model-setup-queries\/","title":{"rendered":"Fluent Multiple Sliding Mesh Model Setup Queries"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Hi,<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">I&rsquo;m trying to model a small 4 bladed rotor and have two hopefully small queries.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span><span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp;<\/span>The model consists of a 360 mm diameter rotor with 4 blades of 70mm chord.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>The rotor rotates at 500 RPM CCW which gives a chord based Reynold&rsquo;s number of approx. 40,000.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>Each of the 4 blades pitches in a sinusoidal manner to +\/-45 degrees as the rotor rotates, in one rotor rotation.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>The rotor geometry is shown in image 1 below.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">To achieve the mesh motion I&rsquo;ve created a Define_CG_Motion UDF for the rotor and each of the blade regions, and defined a dynamic mesh for each treating them as a rigid body.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/span>The moving meshes are working as they should in preview mesh motion, but one thing I am finding is that there is a velocity gradient across each of the blade interfaces as shown in image 2.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>There is a non-conformal mesh at the boundary due to each part being imported as separate bodies from Solid works.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">I&rsquo;ve tried conformal meshes and refined the mesh in this area to something that is really fine and the problem persists.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>Along with structured and unstructured meshes.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>I&rsquo;ve also tried a 0.05mm gap at the interface and the situation is the same.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>The velocity discontinuity is typically only 1-2 mesh elements high.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">I&#8217;ve checked the model setup and can&#8217;t see anything else that could cause this.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>I&#8217;ve also undertaken a time step sensitivity analysis down to 0.25deg\/step and it&#8217;s still the same.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>I am solving the problem with the k-&omega; SST model with low Reynold&rsquo;s Correction.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>I&rsquo;m using a coupled based solver and have the residuals set to 1e-4.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The overall geometry extends to 20 x rotor diameter on all sides.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/span>The rotor is essentially a small rotor in a large room with no imposed free stream velocity.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>The rotor generates its own wake so I have assigned each of the boundary conditions as symmetry so the normal velocity component and pressure at the symmetry plane is zero.<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>I am not sure if this is the best boundary condition?<span style=\"mso-spacerun: yes;\">&nbsp; <\/span>If I used a velocity inlet it would be zero.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Any information on the two queries would be much appreciated.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6032193\/uploads\/attachments\/60c64bf5-2794-443c-9a02-ab5300ee6928\/0e5b736b-5888-4685-ae76-ab56011b5f08_image-1.jpg?width=690&amp;upscale=false\" alt=\"\"><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6032193\/uploads\/attachments\/60c64bf5-2794-443c-9a02-ab5300ee6928\/0847bd53-cdd5-45af-9086-ab56011b6f80_image-2.jpg?width=690&amp;upscale=false\" alt=\"\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-40599","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_bbp_old_topic_id":["12779"],"_bbp_old_topic_author_name_id":["Anonymous"],"_bbp_old_is_topic_anonymous_id":["false"],"_bbp_old_closed_status_id":["publish"],"_bbp_author_ip":[null],"_bbp_old_sticky_status_id":["normal"],"_bbp_likes_count":["0"],"_btv_view_count":["2402"],"_bbp_subscription":["247047"],"_bbp_topic_status":["unanswered"],"_bbp_status":["publish"],"_bbp_topic_id":["40599"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27792"],"_bbp_engagement":["199","172769"],"_bbp_voice_count":["2"],"_bbp_reply_count":["9"],"_bbp_last_reply_id":["106038"],"_bbp_last_active_id":["106038"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["2020-02-20 17:17:51"]},"test":"engineer86"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/40599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/40599\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}