{"id":398515,"date":"2024-12-26T11:55:05","date_gmt":"2024-12-26T11:55:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/post-processing-consideration-for-wave-port-excitations-in-rectangular-waveguide\/"},"modified":"2025-01-02T08:03:16","modified_gmt":"2025-01-02T08:03:16","slug":"post-processing-consideration-for-wave-port-excitations-in-rectangular-waveguide","status":"answered","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/post-processing-consideration-for-wave-port-excitations-in-rectangular-waveguide\/","title":{"rendered":"Post-Processing Consideration for Wave Port Excitations in Rectangular Waveguide"},"content":{"rendered":"

<p data-sourcepos=”1:1-1:165″>”I’m designing a rectangular waveguide, waveguide-to-coax adapter is going to act as input and using a wave port for excitation. I’m currently simulating the rectangular waveguide alone.<\/p><p data-sourcepos=”3:1-3:82″>Should I chose ‘Port Renormalize’ or ‘Do Not Renormalize’ in the post-processing setup of waveport ?<\/p><p data-sourcepos=”5:1-5:177″>I believe ‘Do Not Renormalize’ is more appropriate in this case because the waveguide-to-coax adapter, when included, will define the input impedance, not a simple 50-ohm coax.<\/p><p data-sourcepos=”7:1-7:76″>Could you please confirm my understanding and provide any further guidance?<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-398515","topic","type-topic","status-answered","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t