


{"id":38497,"date":"2019-10-23T02:36:25","date_gmt":"2019-10-23T02:36:25","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/topic\/shared-topology-in-designmodeler-vs-spaceclaim\/"},"modified":"2019-10-23T02:36:25","modified_gmt":"2019-10-23T02:36:25","slug":"shared-topology-in-designmodeler-vs-spaceclaim","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/shared-topology-in-designmodeler-vs-spaceclaim\/","title":{"rendered":"Shared topology in DesignModeler vs SpaceClaim"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have been aiming to use conformal meshes on my simulations that involve a layered material where the layers have different mechanical properties. In setting up the model, I used DesignModeler to create a shared topology. This involved selecting all of the bodies in the model and then selecting, &#8220;Form New Part.&#8221; I have noticed, however, that while the mesh is conformal, there are contact elements and a bonded contact created at the boundary between the layers. If I create a shared topology in SpaceClaim, there aren&#8217;t any contacts created. The results are also slightly different after running the simulation (nothing too drastic, but minor differences).<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Is there any advantage to choosing one method for creating the conformal mesh over the other? I guess it comes down to deciding if those contacts would add any benefit to the simulation or not. I&#8217;ll also note that I just use the default bonded contact settings that DesignModeler creates. In reality, there probably would be some kind of bond between the layers, but I&#8217;m not very concerned with the properties of that bond at the moment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-38497","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_bbp_old_topic_id":["10675"],"_bbp_old_topic_author_name_id":["Anonymous"],"_bbp_old_is_topic_anonymous_id":["false"],"_bbp_old_closed_status_id":["publish"],"_bbp_author_ip":[null],"_bbp_old_sticky_status_id":["normal"],"_bbp_likes_count":["0"],"_btv_view_count":["4000"],"_bbp_subscription":["236661"],"_bbp_topic_status":["unanswered"],"_bbp_status":["publish"],"_bbp_topic_id":["38497"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27790"],"_bbp_engagement":["240","157829","169781"],"_bbp_voice_count":["3"],"_bbp_reply_count":["11"],"_bbp_last_reply_id":["97876"],"_bbp_last_active_id":["97876"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["2019-11-05 20:39:26"]},"test":"joepa_2017"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/38497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/38497\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}