{"id":382485,"date":"2024-09-12T14:36:51","date_gmt":"2024-09-12T14:36:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/correct-procedure\/"},"modified":"2024-09-12T14:36:51","modified_gmt":"2024-09-12T14:36:51","slug":"correct-procedure","status":"publish","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/correct-procedure\/","title":{"rendered":"Correct procedure?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I&#8217;m Alexia, I have a project in Maxwell (ANSYS Student version) where I calculate the ohmic losses and current density when nominal current is flowing through a current path. To determine the temperature of this current path, I copied the same geometry from Maxwell into Icepak and verified the material properties. Since the student version doesn&#8217;t allow me to directly compute the EM losses in Icepak, I use the ACT extension EMtoIcepak, where I use the Maxwell design for the project. The issue arises after I run the coupling: I get the temperature results without any warnings, but when I change the surface materials of the Couplingicepak file (All the surfcaes are in steel, i think it is the automatic material, but i want the same of the ones in the mass of the components that i have in maxwell) I receive the warning that the coupling results are not valid anymore. So i&nbsp;perform &#8220;Analyze All&#8221; on the Icepak coupling, but I receive the warning: &#8220;Coupled simulation restarted due to out of sync coupling control file&#8221;. I believe this is causing the temperature results to vary each time, even though I&#8217;m using the same project and design settings without making any changes. The results differ significantly&#8230;what can be a strategy to obtain the correct results in my current path ?&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-382485","topic","type-topic","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_bbp_author_ip":["147.161.247.100"],"_btv_view_count":["561"],"_bbp_topic_status":["unanswered"],"_bbp_subscription":["455549","432214","460920","186775"],"_bbp_topic_id":["382485"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27784"],"_bbp_engagement":["186775","432214"],"_bbp_voice_count":["2"],"_bbp_reply_count":["3"],"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":["2"],"_bbp_last_reply_id":["387867"],"_bbp_last_active_id":["387867"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["2024-10-02 18:31:13"]},"test":"alexia-careninimail-polimi-it"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/382485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/382485\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=382485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}