{"id":381656,"date":"2024-09-05T15:28:18","date_gmt":"2024-09-05T15:28:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/vof-dpm-transition-physics\/"},"modified":"2024-09-05T19:44:21","modified_gmt":"2024-09-05T19:44:21","slug":"vof-dpm-transition-physics","status":"publish","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/vof-dpm-transition-physics\/","title":{"rendered":"VOF-DPM transition physics"},"content":{"rendered":"

<p><p>I am trying to model atomization thru a pressure swirl atomizer starting with the VOF physics and once successful would like to introduce VOF-DPM transtion as quickly described in this brief video<\/a> on the Ansys YouTube channel. The outlined procedure uses an explicit solver for the VOF physics. My model performs better in terms of convergence with the implicit solver for the VOF physics. Is there any reason, I should not use the implicit VOF physics model to add the VOF-DPM tranistion?<br><br>The video reference above is overy 5 years old and thus uses an older version of Fluent than what I am using. Does Ansys have a new instruction video suitable for a more recent version of Fluent?<br><br>Thanks.<\/p><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-381656","topic","type-topic","status-publish","hentry","topic-tag-multiphase_models-1"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t