


{"id":37633,"date":"2019-09-11T18:00:17","date_gmt":"2019-09-11T18:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/topic\/honeycomb-shear-stress-analysis\/"},"modified":"2019-09-11T18:00:17","modified_gmt":"2019-09-11T18:00:17","slug":"honeycomb-shear-stress-analysis","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/honeycomb-shear-stress-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"Honeycomb shear stress analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">Dear community,<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">I&#8217;m trying to design a honeycomb core using Ansys. In fact, I&#8217;m trying to get the best values for the cell thickness and cell size for a honeycomb made with an isotropic thermoplastic (E1=4GPa, Poisson1=0,38 and density1 = 1400kg\/m3, G1=1,38GPa). Sheets are made from a quasi-isotropic composite (E2=60GPa, Poisson2 = 0,3 and density2 = 1800kg\/m3) and have a 1mm thickness.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">As you can see on the figure below, I&rsquo;m trying to find the best values for t=t&rsquo;, a=b and d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6032193\/uploads\/attachments\/37c0141d-f9c8-4a4f-be7f-aab0012521c5\/1efb060d-44ed-481d-b071-aac501280361_honey.jpg?width=690&amp;upscale=false\" alt=\"\"><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">After reading this topic (<a href=\"\/forums\/topic\/honeycomb-structure-adhesive-contact\/?order=all#comment-6fd55119-d2d8-453f-bcd7-a80e016d971f\">\/forum\/forums\/topic\/honeycomb-structure-adhesive-contact\/?order=all#comment-6fd55119-d2d8-453f-bcd7-a80e016d971f<\/a>) I have decided to model my honeycomb core using a solid orthotropic material.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">When one is changing the size of the cell and the thickness of the walls, the equivalent properties of the honeycomb core, governed by the following equations, are going to change :<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">E*=1,15xE1x(t\/l)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">Gxz=Gyz=0,58xG1x(t\/l)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">I have made some assumptions to get this equations : the cell is regular and the properties are the same on the X and Y directions. So, for each cell dimension, I will calculate the equivalent properties and apply it to my core.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">Now, I would like to get the maximum shear stress for each case. I&#8217;m modelling the sandwich panel using shell elements for the skin and for the core. In order to check if my model is correct, I have fixed the plate at one edge and applied a force on the&nbsp;opposite&nbsp;one. My problem is that my shear result doesn&#8217;t correspond to my hand calculations. Indeed, for a rectangular section, the maximum shear stress is supposed to be (3\/2)x(T\/b\/h) with T the shear force (here equal to the applied force).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">In my case, the section is 960x5mm and the force is equal to 1000N so the maximum shear is supposed to be (3\/2)x(1000\/5\/960)=312kPa<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6032193\/uploads\/attachments\/37c0141d-f9c8-4a4f-be7f-aab0012521c5\/963275a2-5fa6-46c0-bbee-aac501281826_sans-titre.jpg?width=690&amp;upscale=false\" alt=\"\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\">Thanks for helping me !<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-37633","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_bbp_old_topic_id":["9811"],"_bbp_old_topic_author_name_id":["Anonymous"],"_bbp_old_is_topic_anonymous_id":["false"],"_bbp_old_closed_status_id":["publish"],"_bbp_author_ip":[null],"_bbp_old_sticky_status_id":["normal"],"_bbp_likes_count":["0"],"_btv_view_count":["910"],"_bbp_subscription":["242275"],"_bbp_topic_status":["unanswered"],"_bbp_status":["publish"],"_bbp_topic_id":["37633"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27791"],"_bbp_engagement":["240","167812"],"_bbp_voice_count":["2"],"_bbp_reply_count":["4"],"_bbp_last_reply_id":["94089"],"_bbp_last_active_id":["94089"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["2019-09-11 23:35:09"]},"test":"clement08"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/37633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/37633\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}