{"id":370215,"date":"2024-07-03T01:36:00","date_gmt":"2024-07-03T01:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/fluent-bug-in-storing-the-report-definition-variable\/"},"modified":"2024-07-04T14:21:52","modified_gmt":"2024-07-04T14:21:52","slug":"fluent-bug-in-storing-the-report-definition-variable","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/fluent-bug-in-storing-the-report-definition-variable\/","title":{"rendered":"FLUENT: bug in storing the Report Definition variable"},"content":{"rendered":"

First off, I’m glad that the forum is back online! Thanks to anyone involved with the maintenance, and hello!!<\/em> to anyone who’s reading this, it’s nice to connect with you again!<\/p>\n

The issue I faced is pretty simple. I noticed something very strange in my Reynolds number output parameter, it was way off.
I tried messing around with the variables and look what happens.<\/p>\n

\"\"If I compute this surface averaged density I get some value
If I compute this surface averaged molecular viscosity I get some other value.<\/p>\n

But if I call them together in an expression (I went for the simple ratio) they become the same!!! Just tried with the product, I get 10^-11, this means the density switched to the density value.<\/p>\n

I’m working on Fluent 19R3 via Workbench, is there any known issue\/solution\/workaround?
I already tried recreating those three variables from scratch (the viscosity, the density and the Reynolds) using a different name, just in case some funny overwriting occured, but the issue persists.<\/p>\n

Sorry if I happened to incur in some major mistake or oversight<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-370215","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t