{"id":366743,"date":"2024-05-14T09:42:39","date_gmt":"2024-05-14T09:42:39","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/"},"modified":"2024-11-05T14:02:40","modified_gmt":"2024-11-05T14:02:40","slug":"changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/","title":{"rendered":"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have modeled a 3-D beam with dimensions: 100mm x 100 mm x 500mm in ANSYS workbench. ANSYS by default, is considering SOLID186 as an element type. The ANSYS modal results are based on Timoshenko beam theory, which does not match analytical results based on Euler theory. Can anyone suggest how I can force ANSYS to provide results based on Euler theory?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-366743","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I have modeled a 3-D beam with dimensions: 100mm x 100 mm x 500mm in ANSYS workbench. ANSYS by default, is considering SOLID186 as an element type. The ANSYS modal results are based on Timoshenko beam theory, which does not match analytical results based on Euler theory. Can anyone suggest how I can force ANSYS\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I have modeled a 3-D beam with dimensions: 100mm x 100 mm x 500mm in ANSYS workbench. ANSYS by default, is considering SOLID186 as an element type. The ANSYS modal results are based on Timoshenko beam theory, which does not match analytical results based on Euler theory. Can anyone suggest how I can force ANSYS\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-14T09:42:39+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-05T14:02:40+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"I have modeled a 3-D beam with dimensions: 100mm x 100 mm x 500mm in ANSYS workbench. ANSYS by default, is considering SOLID186 as an element type. The ANSYS modal results are based on Timoshenko beam theory, which does not match analytical results based on Euler theory. Can anyone suggest how I can force ANSYS\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Topics\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Topics\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/topics\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/topics\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Topics\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\\\/\",\"name\":\"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory | Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"I have modeled a 3-D beam with dimensions: 100mm x 100 mm x 500mm in ANSYS workbench. ANSYS by default, is considering SOLID186 as an element type. The ANSYS modal results are based on Timoshenko beam theory, which does not match analytical results based on Euler theory. Can anyone suggest how I can force ANSYS\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/topic\\\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-14T09:42:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-05T14:02:40+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"I have modeled a 3-D beam with dimensions: 100mm x 100 mm x 500mm in ANSYS workbench. ANSYS by default, is considering SOLID186 as an element type. The ANSYS modal results are based on Timoshenko beam theory, which does not match analytical results based on Euler theory. Can anyone suggest how I can force ANSYS","canonical_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/topics\/#listItem","name":"Topics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/topics\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Topics","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/topics\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/#listItem","name":"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/#listItem","position":3,"name":"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/topics\/#listItem","name":"Topics"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/","name":"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"I have modeled a 3-D beam with dimensions: 100mm x 100 mm x 500mm in ANSYS workbench. ANSYS by default, is considering SOLID186 as an element type. The ANSYS modal results are based on Timoshenko beam theory, which does not match analytical results based on Euler theory. Can anyone suggest how I can force ANSYS","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2024-05-14T09:42:39+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-05T14:02:40+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space","og:type":"article","og:title":"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory | Ansys Learning Forum","og:description":"I have modeled a 3-D beam with dimensions: 100mm x 100 mm x 500mm in ANSYS workbench. ANSYS by default, is considering SOLID186 as an element type. The ANSYS modal results are based on Timoshenko beam theory, which does not match analytical results based on Euler theory. Can anyone suggest how I can force ANSYS","og:url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/","article:published_time":"2024-05-14T09:42:39+00:00","article:modified_time":"2024-11-05T14:02:40+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory | Ansys Learning Forum","twitter:description":"I have modeled a 3-D beam with dimensions: 100mm x 100 mm x 500mm in ANSYS workbench. ANSYS by default, is considering SOLID186 as an element type. The ANSYS modal results are based on Timoshenko beam theory, which does not match analytical results based on Euler theory. Can anyone suggest how I can force ANSYS"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"366743","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"content","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":true,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2024-10-28 16:42:27","updated":"2024-10-28 16:42:27","ai":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/topics\/\" title=\"Topics\">Topics<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tchanging timoshenko beam theory into euler theory\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum"},{"label":"Topics","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/topics\/"},{"label":"changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/changing-timoshenko-beam-theory-into-euler-theory\/"}],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_bbp_subscription":["8181","240","58821"],"_bbp_author_ip":["23.216.133.166"]," _bbp_last_reply_id":["0"]," _bbp_likes_count":["0"],"_btv_view_count":["2639"],"_bbp_topic_status":["unanswered"],"_bbp_status":["publish"],"_bbp_notification_enabled":["8181"],"_bbp_topic_id":["366743"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27791"],"_bbp_engagement":["240","8181","58821"],"_bbp_voice_count":["3"],"_bbp_reply_count":["22"],"_bbp_last_reply_id":["392696"],"_bbp_last_active_id":["392696"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["2024-11-05 05:10:10"]},"test":"sriparna-2021rce15mnnit-ac-in"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/366743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/366743\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}