


{"id":357628,"date":"2024-03-18T13:27:40","date_gmt":"2024-03-18T13:27:40","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/topic\/coupled-field\/"},"modified":"2024-03-20T13:52:07","modified_gmt":"2024-03-20T13:52:07","slug":"coupled-field","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/coupled-field\/","title":{"rendered":"Coupled Field"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hi everybody,<\/p>\n<p>I have a coupled field (CF) simulation with thermal and structural as selected physics.<\/p>\n<p>Previously I had a transient thermal and a transient structural analysis system linked, with the disadvantage that the structural analysis only started once the thermal analysis was completed. Since I have one material with a very high expansion rate (more than tenfold) I had to &#8220;adjust&#8221; the lambda values for the expansion I&#8217;d expect at a certain temperature.<\/p>\n<p>Then I tried to use a CF to calculate both physics in each timestep. I thought I had to use the &#8220;real&#8221; lambda values now since my material has now the correct expansion (in this case the correct thickness) for the calculation of the heat conductance. Looking at my simulation results I saw temperatures that were way to high on the &#8220;cold&#8221; side. My suspicion was that the expansion at a certain timestep in my simulation wasn&#8217;t taken into consideration for the calculation of the heat conduction. To confirm this I tried another run with the SCTE close to glass (=way lower) and I got the exact same temperature on the &#8220;cold&#8221; side again.<\/p>\n<p>So my question: Am I doing sth. wrong (e.g. missing a check somewhere) or isn&#8217;t the CF analysis able to take variing lenghts\/thicknesses during a simulation into consideration when calculating the heat conduction?<\/p>\n<p>Thank you,<\/p>\n<p>Christian<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-357628","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry","topic-tag-ansys-transient-thermal-2","topic-tag-coupled-field-1","topic-tag-mechanical","topic-tag-transient-structural"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_bbp_subscription":["36261","490","240","58821"],"_bbp_author_ip":["96.7.218.223"]," _bbp_last_reply_id":["0"]," _bbp_likes_count":["0"],"_btv_view_count":["1221"],"_bbp_topic_status":["unanswered"],"_edit_lock":["1710773430:198964"],"_bbp_status":["publish"],"_bbp_topic_id":["357628"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27791"],"_bbp_engagement":["240","490","36261","58821"],"_bbp_voice_count":["4"],"_bbp_reply_count":["5"],"_bbp_last_reply_id":["358150"],"_bbp_last_active_id":["358150"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["2024-03-20 13:51:50"]},"test":"christian-neuertugraz-at"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/357628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/357628\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":357661,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/357628\/revisions\/357661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=357628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}