


{"id":355003,"date":"2024-03-03T22:35:39","date_gmt":"2024-03-03T22:35:39","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/?post_type=topic&#038;p=355003"},"modified":"2024-03-03T22:35:39","modified_gmt":"2024-03-03T22:35:39","slug":"large-deflection-convergence-problem","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/large-deflection-convergence-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"Large deflection convergence problem"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hi everyone,<\/p>\n<p>I am solving a quite simple problem of pipe undergoing pressurizing up to about 10 kPa. Static structural. The model is solved succesfully even with 1 substep&nbsp;<strong>when large deflection=off:<br \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/03-03-2024-1709502834-mceclip0.png\"><br \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>However, setting large deflection=on, cause non-convergence, with a standard warning &#8220;The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained&#8221;. I tried auto time stepping with many substeps on the level of 1000 without success.<br \/>Below I listet what I tried:<br \/>&#8211; changing mesh number of elements through thickness, as 1, 2, 3 or 4 &#8211; no effect on convergence,<br \/>&#8211; changing mesh density through the pipe length, as the higher gradients are in the endings regions &#8211; no effect,<br \/>&#8211; changing the pressure boundary condition, as if it linearly increases from the endings to the final value (depicted below) &#8211; didnt help<br \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/03-03-2024-1709503267-mceclip0.png\"><br \/>&#8211; trying to use tetrahedral mesh instead, with Nonlinear Adaptive Region option activated &#8211; without success,<br \/>&#8211; activating Semi-implicit option &#8211; I just putted command &#8220;SEMIIMPLICIT&#8221; i.e. without editing this utility&#8217; options. This allowed me to solve greater part of the load, however with the extreme deformations which were growing rapidly within the last solved steps, as depicted below on the true-scale deformation field and the charts:<br \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/03\/03-03-2024-1709505023-mceclip1.png\"><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; tuning settings of the Analysis settings -&gt;nonlinear controls -&gt; stabilization; to my suprise this got completely no effect, no matter what option of stabilization I choose or what values of constants I put, I can even completely turn off stabilization and have the same substeps number solved, as for stabilization=program controlled (or some option manually chosen)<\/p>\n<p>I am aware, that in such problems the issue might be simply, the relation between the Young modulus and loads. In my model, I got very small pipe (diameters about 0.3 milimeters), Young modulus about 21 kPa and inside pressure 10 kPa. I can succesfully solve the large-deflection model for decreased pressure to max 2.5 kPa, or with pressure unchanged (10 kPa) but increased Young modulus, up to 100 kPa, if I remember correctly.<br \/>Hovever, in my opinion I got correct model, geometry and material properties, which I concluded based on three things: 1) large deflection=off model results, 2) analytical model results, 3) experimental results. All three results are similar. Therefore I still think, that this is the issue of stabilizing the solver, which I am trying to do.<\/p>\n<p>Please guide me, what I might also try to solve the issue,<br \/>Kind regards<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-355003","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry","topic-tag-large-deflection","topic-tag-non-convergence","topic-tag-structures"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_bbp_author_ip":["23.218.248.146"],"_bbp_subscription":["70859","20905","16517"],"_btv_view_count":["3968"],"_bbp_topic_status":["unanswered"],"_bbp_topic_id":["355003"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27791"],"_bbp_engagement":["16517","20905","70859"],"_bbp_voice_count":["3"],"_bbp_reply_count":["10"],"_bbp_last_reply_id":["356565"],"_bbp_last_active_id":["356565"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["2024-03-12 08:37:34"]},"test":"marcin-nowak1pg-edu-pl"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/355003","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/355003\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":355005,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/355003\/revisions\/355005"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}