![](\"\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/28-11-2023-1701166392-mceclip1.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nwhen I ran the first study I had a neat 10×4 table, with 10 different cases and the 4 variables listed on each column.<\/p>\n
Now that I’ve added another study, I’ll have a 20×8 table:<\/p>\n
- \n
- Cells A1:D10 have the data for the first study<\/li>\n
- Cells E11:H20 have the data for the second study<\/li>\n
- Cells A11:D20 and E1:H10 have useless data about an eventual cross study between the two.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
This situation will only get worse once I’ll start adding more data. I plan to have about 10 different studies or more, resulting in a parametric matrix about 100×40 big, with the useful data scattered in a sea of useless numbers. It will be impossible for me to have order in this mess, forcing me to have a different .wbpj for each new study.<\/p>\n
Can I separate the parametric tables somehow? I’m 100% certain all my studies are independent and won’t cross with each other. Do I need to create a whole new project just for each case? I hope there’s a smarter way.<\/p>\n
Thanks in advance for any tip.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-319728","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t