


{"id":240486,"date":"2022-11-11T11:01:18","date_gmt":"2022-11-11T11:01:18","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/topic\/how-to-increase-beam-elements-beam188-189-section-cells-with-secdata\/"},"modified":"2022-11-22T09:17:27","modified_gmt":"2022-11-22T09:17:27","slug":"how-to-increase-beam-elements-beam188-189-section-cells-with-secdata","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/how-to-increase-beam-elements-beam188-189-section-cells-with-secdata\/","title":{"rendered":"How to increase beam element&#8217;s (BEAM188\/189) section cells with SECDATA ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hello everyone,<\/p>\n<p>I know that it is possible to add more cells to beam element&#8217;s (for example BEAM188 or BEAM189) cross-section with SECDATA command, but after using SECDATA the results of the calculation is nonsence. For example when using rectangular cross-section for beam element the default cell count along width and height is 2 &#8212;&gt; &#8220;SECDATA,50,100,2,2&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>I have added APDL commands object under static structural to increase cross-section&#8217;s cell count from 4(2X2) to 36(6X6) and also taking account warping and shear stresses from transverse shearing with following content:<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>FINISH<\/p>\n<p>\/PREP7<\/p>\n<p>SECTYPE,1,BEAM,RECT<br \/>SECDATA,50.,100.,6.,6.<br \/>secoffset,cent<\/p>\n<p>KEYOPT,1,1,1<br \/>KEYOPT,1,4,2<\/p>\n<p>allsel<\/p>\n<p>SAVE,file,db<br \/>FINISH<\/p>\n<p>\/SOLU<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>I think that this command object adds the cross-sectional cells, but when post-processing for example the von Mises stress results, they are nonsense&#8230; What I&#8217;m doing wrong, should the beam be remeshed in some way to add the additional cell points ?<\/p>\n<p>Another interesting thing is that why beam188 and beam189 elements doesn&#8217;t take in account flexure-related shear stresses in addition to shear stresses caused by torsion by default &#8212;&gt; KEYOPT,N,4,2 ? By default beam elements calculates only shear stresses caused by torsion &#8212;&gt;KEYOPT,N,4,0. I think that this kind of default setting might be quite dangerous in some scenarios.<\/p>\n<p>Best regards,<\/p>\n<p>Pirelli93<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-240486","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"custom_fields":[{"0":{"_bbp_subscription":["239624","18229","50680"],"_bbp_author_ip":["23.223.149.206"]," _bbp_last_reply_id":["0"]," _bbp_likes_count":["0"],"_btv_view_count":["4232"],"_edit_lock":["1668164554:163764"],"_bbp_status":["publish"],"_bbp_topic_status":["unanswered"],"_bbp_topic_id":["240486"],"_bbp_forum_id":["27791"],"_bbp_engagement":["18229","50680","239624"],"_bbp_voice_count":["3"],"_bbp_reply_count":["4"],"_bbp_last_reply_id":["240986"],"_bbp_last_active_id":["240986"],"_bbp_last_active_time":["2022-11-16 12:17:29"]},"test":"pirkka-ruotsalainen1gmail-com"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/240486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics\/240486\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=240486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}