{"id":235801,"date":"2022-09-20T14:34:08","date_gmt":"2022-09-20T14:34:08","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/topic\/combined-vector-load-vs-multiple-single-axis-loads-for-static-structural\/"},"modified":"2022-09-20T14:34:08","modified_gmt":"2022-09-20T14:34:08","slug":"combined-vector-load-vs-multiple-single-axis-loads-for-static-structural","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/combined-vector-load-vs-multiple-single-axis-loads-for-static-structural\/","title":{"rendered":"Combined Vector Load vs. Multiple Single Axis Loads for Static Structural"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hello,<\/p>\n

I am currently trying to get the stress and reaction forces for a part under loading conditions with simultaneous XYZ loading. When doing this I ran it both using a single remote force containing all three loads as well as three separate remote forces each containing a single direction all at the same timestep. The results I am getting for these two setups are markedly different even though logically they should be equivalent. Could anyone walk me through why these setups return such different results, as well as which one should be more accurate.<\/p>\n

Here are the load setups and the results they returned.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Any insight into this issue would be incredibly appreciated, thank you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-235801","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry","topic-tag-ansysworkbench-ansys-staticstructural","topic-tag-remote-force"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t