{"id":161610,"date":"2021-08-25T17:55:05","date_gmt":"2021-08-25T17:55:05","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/topic\/boundary-condition-at-wall-for-conjugate-heat-transfer-cht-in-porous-media-using-ltne-model\/"},"modified":"2021-09-02T16:00:08","modified_gmt":"2021-09-02T16:00:08","slug":"boundary-condition-at-wall-for-conjugate-heat-transfer-cht-in-porous-media-using-ltne-model","status":"closed","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/topic\/boundary-condition-at-wall-for-conjugate-heat-transfer-cht-in-porous-media-using-ltne-model\/","title":{"rendered":"Boundary condition at wall for conjugate heat transfer (CHT) in porous media using LTNE model?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

I am trying to simulate CHT to a porous media where a local thermal non-equilibrium (LTNE) model is used. When the LTNE model is invoked the wall is separated into two, i.e. one for the solid region and one for fluid. Additionally, I have a wall for the adjacent insulation. The figure is attached here. I have assigned the boundary condition (BC) interface to all three walls. When the mesh interface is applied to all three walls, I come up with 2 shadows and 5 walls. This is undesirable in my case. I wish to obtain a wall and 2 shadows.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\"geoetry1.JPG\"
\n<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-161610","topic","type-topic","status-closed","hentry","topic-tag-interface-boundary","topic-tag-porous-media","topic-tag-wall-shadow"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t