{"id":397168,"date":"2024-12-11T19:44:50","date_gmt":"2024-12-11T19:44:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/397168\/"},"modified":"2024-12-11T19:44:50","modified_gmt":"2024-12-11T19:44:50","slug":"397168","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/397168\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: MQW structure auto-populating in CHARGE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just a quick confirmation that we do not expect the discrepancy described above to cause inaccuracies, given that the difference is smaller than MQW&#8217;s smallest grid size. Still, we may be able to make a change in future releases so that the value in the table is exactly matching what is defined in MQW structure group.&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-397168","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/397168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/397168\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=397168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}