{"id":392380,"date":"2024-11-01T10:00:55","date_gmt":"2024-11-01T10:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/392380\/"},"modified":"2024-11-01T10:00:55","modified_gmt":"2024-11-01T10:00:55","slug":"392380","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/392380\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: AQWA: Pitch added mass is shown as Kg m^2\/ degree"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;Sure, I have realised that but when we are going to obtain results about position, velocity and acceleration we have to choose a sub-type of the analysis. The optimal sub-type to choose is Low-Frequency? Because at first I chose Actual Responsea and the values I got were higher (obviously) than the low-frequency one. Keep in mind that I would like to compare my statistical results with regulations for wind turbine sub-structures.&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-392380","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/392380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/392380\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=392380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}