{"id":391331,"date":"2024-10-25T06:03:26","date_gmt":"2024-10-25T06:03:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391331\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T06:03:26","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T06:03:26","slug":"391331","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391331\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: changing timoshenko beam theory into euler theory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your reply and your valuable time.&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would just like to clarify&#8230;&#8230;I extracted 55 mode shapes only and in 55 modes the error has crossed 50% from the theoritical. So, according to the 12 elements for a sinusoid&#8230;.upto mode 166 there should be no error. Please comment whether my conclusion is right or wrong.&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would like to ask which mass matrix is accurate:consistent or lumped?&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-391331","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/391331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/391331\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=391331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}