


{"id":391164,"date":"2024-10-24T07:18:14","date_gmt":"2024-10-24T07:18:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/"},"modified":"2024-10-24T07:20:45","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T07:20:45","slug":"391164","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think that now I start to understand what is going wrong with the axial velocity profiles:&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/10\/24-10-2024-1729754143-mceclip0.png\" \/>&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As you can see, the axial velocity is predicted too low, even negative, at the center for both SSTCC and RSM. I think this is a direct result of the backflow from the pressure-outlet at the top, that is now &lsquo;pushing fluid&rsquo; into the boundary exactly in the same direction of the shift in axial velocity at the center. Currently, I&rsquo;m using standard backflow settings, so direction normal to boundary and uniform total pressure, which is not really correct. I&rsquo;m still thinking on how to improve the settings of the backflow, but I&rsquo;m convinced this is contributing to the differences between CFD and experimental data.&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-391164","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I think that now I start to understand what is going wrong with the axial velocity profiles: As you can see, the axial velocity is predicted too low, even negative, at the center for both SSTCC and RSM. I think this is a direct result of the backflow from the pressure-outlet at the top, that is\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I think that now I start to understand what is going wrong with the axial velocity profiles: As you can see, the axial velocity is predicted too low, even negative, at the center for both SSTCC and RSM. I think this is a direct result of the backflow from the pressure-outlet at the top, that is\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/10\/24-10-2024-1729754143-mceclip0.png\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:secure_url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/10\/24-10-2024-1729754143-mceclip0.png\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-24T07:18:14+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-24T07:20:45+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"I think that now I start to understand what is going wrong with the axial velocity profiles: As you can see, the axial velocity is predicted too low, even negative, at the center for both SSTCC and RSM. I think this is a direct result of the backflow from the pressure-outlet at the top, that is\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/10\/24-10-2024-1729754143-mceclip0.png\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/391164\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/391164\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/391164\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/391164\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/391164\\\/\",\"name\":\"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM | Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"I think that now I start to understand what is going wrong with the axial velocity profiles: As you can see, the axial velocity is predicted too low, even negative, at the center for both SSTCC and RSM. I think this is a direct result of the backflow from the pressure-outlet at the top, that is\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/391164\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-24T07:18:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-24T07:20:45+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"I think that now I start to understand what is going wrong with the axial velocity profiles: As you can see, the axial velocity is predicted too low, even negative, at the center for both SSTCC and RSM. I think this is a direct result of the backflow from the pressure-outlet at the top, that is","canonical_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/#listItem","name":"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","name":"Home"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/","name":"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"I think that now I start to understand what is going wrong with the axial velocity profiles: As you can see, the axial velocity is predicted too low, even negative, at the center for both SSTCC and RSM. I think this is a direct result of the backflow from the pressure-outlet at the top, that is","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2024-10-24T07:18:14+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-24T07:20:45+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space","og:type":"article","og:title":"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM | Ansys Learning Forum","og:description":"I think that now I start to understand what is going wrong with the axial velocity profiles: As you can see, the axial velocity is predicted too low, even negative, at the center for both SSTCC and RSM. I think this is a direct result of the backflow from the pressure-outlet at the top, that is","og:url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/","og:image":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/10\/24-10-2024-1729754143-mceclip0.png","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/10\/24-10-2024-1729754143-mceclip0.png","article:published_time":"2024-10-24T07:18:14+00:00","article:modified_time":"2024-10-24T07:20:45+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM | Ansys Learning Forum","twitter:description":"I think that now I start to understand what is going wrong with the axial velocity profiles: As you can see, the axial velocity is predicted too low, even negative, at the center for both SSTCC and RSM. I think this is a direct result of the backflow from the pressure-outlet at the top, that is","twitter:image":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/10\/24-10-2024-1729754143-mceclip0.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"391164","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"content","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":true,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2024-10-28 16:21:45","updated":"2024-10-28 16:21:45","ai":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tReply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum"},{"label":"Reply To: Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/391164\/"}],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/391164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/391164\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":391165,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/391164\/revisions\/391165"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=391164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}