{"id":381344,"date":"2024-09-02T13:58:31","date_gmt":"2024-09-02T13:58:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/381344\/"},"modified":"2024-09-02T13:58:31","modified_gmt":"2024-09-02T13:58:31","slug":"381344","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/381344\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: \u201cAnsys.Fluent.Cortex.CortexNotAvailableException\u201d was thrown"},"content":{"rendered":"

<p>Hello,<\/p><p>Lets fix the mapping issue first. Both interfaces have mapping < 100%. <\/p><p>To have a good mapping between the participant interfaces:<\/p><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Make sure FSI interfaces on fluid and solid sides overlap. The recommendation is to use the solid geometry for fluid volume extraction (the same source geometry).<\/li>\n
  2. Meshes used should first resolve geometry curvature and physics (e.g. flow gradients, stress concentrations).<\/li>\n
  3. For conserved quantities (force, heat flow) the coarser target mesh is acceptable. Similar mesh on both interfaces is also acceptable but not required.<\/li>\n
  4. For non-conserved quantities such as displacement and temperature, finer target mesh is preferred (ex. CFD mesh is usually finer than Mechanical).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    <p>Refer user guide for more information: Improving Mapping Quality (ansys.com)<\/a> and tutorial to know more about the two-way FSI workflow: Reed Valve FSI Co-Simulation with Partial Setup Export from Workbench (Fluent-Mechanical) (ansys.com)<\/a><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-381344","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t