{"id":380722,"date":"2024-08-27T16:56:55","date_gmt":"2024-08-27T16:56:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/380722\/"},"modified":"2024-08-27T16:56:55","modified_gmt":"2024-08-27T16:56:55","slug":"380722","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/380722\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Difference between “Python Code” and “Scripting” in ANSYS Mechanical"},"content":{"rendered":"

<div>For example, I use “Scripting” to configure the following settings: setting the “Number of Steps” to 100. The script will then automatically adjust the “Current Step Number” from 100 down to 1. When the “Number of Steps” is set to 5, the scripting completes the setup without any issues. Therefore, I believe the Python code I’ve written in “Scripting” is functioning correctly.<\/div><div><br><br><br><\/div><div>My main question is how I can run “Scripting” without encountering issues. Is the problem due to a limitation within the scripting itself, or is it related to computational limitations? I have tried increasing the number of CPU cores, but based on my testing, it hasn’t resolved the problem. I’m wondering if I’ve set up the “Advanced Options” incorrectly. If so, how can I adjust them to make the most effective use of the CPU and ensure that the script runs smoothly?<\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-380722","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t