{"id":380715,"date":"2024-08-27T16:47:01","date_gmt":"2024-08-27T16:47:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/380715\/"},"modified":"2024-08-27T16:47:01","modified_gmt":"2024-08-27T16:47:01","slug":"380715","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/380715\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Difference between “Python Code” and “Scripting” in ANSYS Mechanical"},"content":{"rendered":"

<div>As shown in the screenshot you shared, I use “Scripting” to change the “Number of Steps” to 100 and adjust the left settings under it accordingly. I have tested a simple case, for example, setting the “Number of Steps” to 5, and “Scripting” successfully adjusts all settings as needed. However, when the “Number of Steps” is set to 100, the machine crashes before it can finish updating all the details in “Analysis Settings.”<\/div><div> <\/div><div>In my screenshot of the “Advanced Options,” even after increasing the number of CPU cores from 72 to 240, the machine still crashes. I am wondering whether this issue is due to the limitations of “Scripting” when changing a large number of settings or if it is related to my CPU’s capability. Even though I can allocate more cores, it hasn’t resolved the issue based on my testing. I’m wondering if I have incorrectly configured the “Advanced Options” for computation, or if there’s a way to better utilize my CPU cores to allow “Scripting” to run without issues. Thanks a lot!<\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-380715","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t