{"id":378237,"date":"2024-08-14T04:01:17","date_gmt":"2024-08-14T04:01:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/378237\/"},"modified":"2024-08-14T04:01:17","modified_gmt":"2024-08-14T04:01:17","slug":"378237","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/378237\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Set up time steps more efficiently"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;In most cases, probably not unless you were careful to use the same IDs written by Mechanical, such as real constants, element type IDs, etc&#8230;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The loads you define by APDL will usually be separate and additional from what Mechanical writes.&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But there could be some conflict applying the same type of load on the same nodes or elements.&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-378237","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/378237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/378237\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=378237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}