{"id":367175,"date":"2024-05-16T14:44:47","date_gmt":"2024-05-16T14:44:47","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/367175\/"},"modified":"2024-05-16T14:44:47","modified_gmt":"2024-05-16T14:44:47","slug":"367175","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/367175\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Heat transfer simulation with convection film coefficient as a result"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;A simplification can be to use an arbitrarily large value for tbulk so that &#8220;deltaT&#8221; doesn&#8217;t affect the heat flow.&nbsp; Another simplification can be to convect to a thermal mass so that the change in enthalpy of the mass is a measure of total heat flow.&nbsp; These still don&#8217;t seem to give you a way to control the total heat flow.&nbsp; Perhaps you could iterate on the solution in a *do loop.&nbsp; I&#8217;m not a Fluent user, but if the flow solution is already done, it doesn&#8217;t seem any easier to use Fluent.&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-367175","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/367175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/367175\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=367175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}