{"id":366529,"date":"2024-05-12T04:18:21","date_gmt":"2024-05-12T04:18:21","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/366529\/"},"modified":"2024-05-12T04:18:21","modified_gmt":"2024-05-12T04:18:21","slug":"366529","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/366529\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Successful explicit analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have figured it out. The problem was in the definition of LOAD_GRAVITY_PART_SET, where I should use 9.81 instead of -9.81. Now the energy curve looks as suggested by Reno Genest.&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/05\/12-05-2024-1715487496-mceclip0.png\" \/>&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-366529","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/366529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/366529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}