{"id":365892,"date":"2024-05-07T15:43:52","date_gmt":"2024-05-07T15:43:52","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/365892\/"},"modified":"2024-05-07T15:43:52","modified_gmt":"2024-05-07T15:43:52","slug":"365892","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/365892\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Floating point stirred tank using DPM"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;Thank you sincerely for your assistance. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#8217;ve come across recommendations on CFD forums suggesting that particle diameters should be less than 1\/10th the size of the smallest mesh element. Could this guideline be a factor in my simulation, given that my particle diameter (3mm) exceeds my minimum mesh size (1mm)? Additionally, could the specific physical models I&#8217;ve chosen be contributing to the unexpectedly high particle velocities? Would switching from a stochastic collision model to a DEM&nbsp; collision model potentially address the unexpectedly high particle velocities I&#8217;m observing?&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-365892","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/365892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/365892\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=365892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}