{"id":364777,"date":"2024-04-29T22:19:12","date_gmt":"2024-04-29T22:19:12","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/364777\/"},"modified":"2024-04-29T22:19:12","modified_gmt":"2024-04-29T22:19:12","slug":"364777","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/364777\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Regarding box of monitors and far field simulations"},"content":{"rendered":"

<p>Hello Amrita,<\/p><p>Thank you for the code. I run the simulation and generated polar plots. I have a question related to the position of the monitor. As I am using box of monitors, all the monitors are on the thin film which I am simulating. <\/p><p><\/a><\/p><p>Here, Z2 monitor, which is the top monitor is on the thin film. But, as I was going through this article “https:\/\/optics.ansys.com\/hc\/en-us\/articles\/360034395194-Changing-the-far-field-refractive-index-analysis-object”. As my monitors are on the film, is this farfield analysis group is considering the refractive index of the vaccum or is it extending the substrate to the infinity? So, how can validate my results to see if this method is correct?<\/p><p> <\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-364777","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t