{"id":346383,"date":"2024-01-24T14:51:14","date_gmt":"2024-01-24T14:51:14","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/346383\/"},"modified":"2024-01-24T14:51:14","modified_gmt":"2024-01-24T14:51:14","slug":"346383","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/346383\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: particle size distribution in histogram is not continuous"},"content":{"rendered":"

<p>We actually did some work for potential boundary layer trapping. the boundary layer was intentionally avoided when injecting particles. this work is modeled by RANS model.<\/p><p>https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=TliOML0AAAAJ&citation_for_view=TliOML0AAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC<\/a><\/p><p>I have checked the particle mass balance, comparing the value of particle mass injected from FLUENT and the input value of 34 seconds injection. 8% error was found.  <\/p><p>I also checked the particle parcel number. 3 seconds is flow-through time, you can see Escaped number is 472,633,343, is about 11 times of 45,453,723; and the simulation time is 34 s. roughly speaking, most particles are behaving normally. if there is a small amount of particles stuck in the boundary layer, I suppose it shouldn’t be a big deal; is this assumption reasonable to you?<\/strong><\/p><p><\/p><p>I could generate some animation <\/strong>of particle based one the figure I posted in the previous reply. We can get some overall impression, but not detailed info. Do you think it will be informative<\/strong>?<\/p><p>I will extract some results of particle movement in the near-wall region for LES modeling.<\/p><p>Thank you for your suggestion.<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-346383","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t