{"id":314478,"date":"2023-11-02T06:47:00","date_gmt":"2023-11-02T06:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/"},"modified":"2023-11-02T06:47:00","modified_gmt":"2023-11-02T06:47:00","slug":"314478","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;I checked that there is a mistake in setting the y point of the mode source. So, I result in similar tendencies between the two graphs. However, the 3D FDTD data is still lower than the TMM result as like below the two graphs.&nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/02-11-2023-1698907411-mceclip0.png\" width=\"405\" height=\"297\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/02-11-2023-1698907431-mceclip1.png\" width=\"426\" height=\"259\" \/>&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there any missed points like boundaries or FDTD settings as I attached the YZ view of the object?&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-314478","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I checked that there is a mistake in setting the y point of the mode source. So, I result in similar tendencies between the two graphs. However, the 3D FDTD data is still lower than the TMM result as like below the two graphs. Are there any missed points like boundaries or FDTD settings as I\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I checked that there is a mistake in setting the y point of the mode source. So, I result in similar tendencies between the two graphs. However, the 3D FDTD data is still lower than the TMM result as like below the two graphs. Are there any missed points like boundaries or FDTD settings as I\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/02-11-2023-1698907411-mceclip0.png\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:secure_url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/02-11-2023-1698907411-mceclip0.png\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-11-02T06:47:00+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-02T06:47:00+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"I checked that there is a mistake in setting the y point of the mode source. So, I result in similar tendencies between the two graphs. However, the 3D FDTD data is still lower than the TMM result as like below the two graphs. Are there any missed points like boundaries or FDTD settings as I\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/02-11-2023-1698907411-mceclip0.png\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/314478\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/314478\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/314478\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/314478\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/314478\\\/\",\"name\":\"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method | Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"I checked that there is a mistake in setting the y point of the mode source. So, I result in similar tendencies between the two graphs. However, the 3D FDTD data is still lower than the TMM result as like below the two graphs. Are there any missed points like boundaries or FDTD settings as I\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/314478\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-02T06:47:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-02T06:47:00+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"I checked that there is a mistake in setting the y point of the mode source. So, I result in similar tendencies between the two graphs. However, the 3D FDTD data is still lower than the TMM result as like below the two graphs. Are there any missed points like boundaries or FDTD settings as I","canonical_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/#listItem","name":"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","name":"Home"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/","name":"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"I checked that there is a mistake in setting the y point of the mode source. So, I result in similar tendencies between the two graphs. However, the 3D FDTD data is still lower than the TMM result as like below the two graphs. Are there any missed points like boundaries or FDTD settings as I","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2023-11-02T06:47:00+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-02T06:47:00+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space","og:type":"article","og:title":"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method | Ansys Learning Forum","og:description":"I checked that there is a mistake in setting the y point of the mode source. So, I result in similar tendencies between the two graphs. However, the 3D FDTD data is still lower than the TMM result as like below the two graphs. Are there any missed points like boundaries or FDTD settings as I","og:url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/","og:image":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/02-11-2023-1698907411-mceclip0.png","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/02-11-2023-1698907411-mceclip0.png","article:published_time":"2023-11-02T06:47:00+00:00","article:modified_time":"2023-11-02T06:47:00+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method | Ansys Learning Forum","twitter:description":"I checked that there is a mistake in setting the y point of the mode source. So, I result in similar tendencies between the two graphs. However, the 3D FDTD data is still lower than the TMM result as like below the two graphs. Are there any missed points like boundaries or FDTD settings as I","twitter:image":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/11\/02-11-2023-1698907411-mceclip0.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"314478","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"content","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":true,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2024-10-28 17:37:19","updated":"2026-08-21 05:36:01","ai":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tReply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum"},{"label":"Reply To: verifying the 3D FDTD simuation versus the Transfer Matrix Method","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/314478\/"}],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/314478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/314478\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=314478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}