{"id":306697,"date":"2023-09-13T15:55:23","date_gmt":"2023-09-13T15:55:23","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/306697\/"},"modified":"2023-09-13T15:55:23","modified_gmt":"2023-09-13T15:55:23","slug":"306697","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/306697\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: 2D supersonic inlet – Meshing"},"content":{"rendered":"

<p>Setting too many constraints can cause problems as the cell size & size smoothing conflicts with the edge sizing. Getting inflation mesh around reflex angles as you near & exceed 270 degrees tends to become difficult. <\/p><p>You’re kind of on the right track with the surface decomposition, but you’ve focussed on getting a block mesh and not on how to help the inflation mesh whilst also accounting for shocks and separation. I can’t tell you how to do this as it’s getting into the “engineering knowledge” domain; I can suggest having a look at some of the older methods we used for mesh decomposition (O-grid and butterfly mesh) for some ideas.  The other option is pave and an awful lot of adaption. <\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-306697","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/306697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/306697\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=306697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}