{"id":293877,"date":"2023-07-19T13:47:27","date_gmt":"2023-07-19T13:47:27","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/293877\/"},"modified":"2023-07-19T13:47:27","modified_gmt":"2023-07-19T13:47:27","slug":"293877","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/293877\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: steady state thermal: radiation + heat flux"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sampat&lt;br&gt;I tried several simulation with different boundary condition. First I used the same model but with higher dimensions to have more radiation.&lt;br&gt;I also obtained temperature of 10^6 K, depending on the value of the heat flux. With Higher heat flux the simulation gives not coerent results.&lt;br&gt;I think that a boundary condition of heat flux on a high surface as in my model (high surface relative on the dimensions of the problem) is &#8220;too rigid&#8221;. So this gives numerical problem on the simulation.&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-293877","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/293877","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/293877\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=293877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}