


{"id":291251,"date":"2023-07-03T11:09:00","date_gmt":"2023-07-03T11:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/"},"modified":"2023-07-03T11:09:00","modified_gmt":"2023-07-03T11:09:00","slug":"291251","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;It&#8217;s a transient calculation so you need to resolve the flow with time, and converge all time steps. The iteration count is irrelevent, it&#8217;s the number of time steps you need to consider. As you&#8217;re not resolving the time scales in the domain I&#8217;d be very wary of the results.&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Changing the boundary condition means the flow sees a sudden jump in value, again, you need to consider time scale.&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-291251","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"It&#039;s a transient calculation so you need to resolve the flow with time, and converge all time steps. The iteration count is irrelevent, it&#039;s the number of time steps you need to consider. As you&#039;re not resolving the time scales in the domain I&#039;d be very wary of the results. Changing the boundary condition means the\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It&#039;s a transient calculation so you need to resolve the flow with time, and converge all time steps. The iteration count is irrelevent, it&#039;s the number of time steps you need to consider. As you&#039;re not resolving the time scales in the domain I&#039;d be very wary of the results. Changing the boundary condition means the\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-03T11:09:00+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-03T11:09:00+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"It&#039;s a transient calculation so you need to resolve the flow with time, and converge all time steps. The iteration count is irrelevent, it&#039;s the number of time steps you need to consider. As you&#039;re not resolving the time scales in the domain I&#039;d be very wary of the results. Changing the boundary condition means the\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/291251\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/291251\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/291251\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/291251\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/291251\\\/\",\"name\":\"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result | Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"It's a transient calculation so you need to resolve the flow with time, and converge all time steps. The iteration count is irrelevent, it's the number of time steps you need to consider. As you're not resolving the time scales in the domain I'd be very wary of the results. Changing the boundary condition means the\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/291251\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-03T11:09:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-03T11:09:00+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"It's a transient calculation so you need to resolve the flow with time, and converge all time steps. The iteration count is irrelevent, it's the number of time steps you need to consider. As you're not resolving the time scales in the domain I'd be very wary of the results. Changing the boundary condition means the","canonical_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/#listItem","name":"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","name":"Home"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/","name":"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"It's a transient calculation so you need to resolve the flow with time, and converge all time steps. The iteration count is irrelevent, it's the number of time steps you need to consider. As you're not resolving the time scales in the domain I'd be very wary of the results. Changing the boundary condition means the","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2023-07-03T11:09:00+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-03T11:09:00+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space","og:type":"article","og:title":"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result | Ansys Learning Forum","og:description":"It's a transient calculation so you need to resolve the flow with time, and converge all time steps. The iteration count is irrelevent, it's the number of time steps you need to consider. As you're not resolving the time scales in the domain I'd be very wary of the results. Changing the boundary condition means the","og:url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/","article:published_time":"2023-07-03T11:09:00+00:00","article:modified_time":"2023-07-03T11:09:00+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result | Ansys Learning Forum","twitter:description":"It's a transient calculation so you need to resolve the flow with time, and converge all time steps. The iteration count is irrelevent, it's the number of time steps you need to consider. As you're not resolving the time scales in the domain I'd be very wary of the results. Changing the boundary condition means the"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"291251","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"content","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":true,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2024-10-28 18:01:08","updated":"2026-08-04 02:30:14","ai":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tReply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum"},{"label":"Reply To: Different boundary condition gives weird result","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/291251\/"}],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/291251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/291251\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=291251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}