{"id":290771,"date":"2023-06-28T15:30:49","date_gmt":"2023-06-28T15:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/290771\/"},"modified":"2023-06-28T15:30:49","modified_gmt":"2023-06-28T15:30:49","slug":"290771","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/290771\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Unexpected S matrix from EME propagation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;&#8221;internal s matrix&#8221; is for diagnose purpose;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&#8221;user s matrix&#8221; is a subset of the total S matrix. So when you only use it to cascade, it loses some other information. I would suggest you to find EME papers to get more details.&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In your case, both will not lead to the expected result you desire. Only when you have those groups inside EME simulation can you get correct result.&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-290771","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/290771","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/290771\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=290771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}