{"id":236092,"date":"2022-09-22T18:27:16","date_gmt":"2022-09-22T18:27:16","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/236092\/"},"modified":"2022-09-22T18:27:16","modified_gmt":"2022-09-22T18:27:16","slug":"236092","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/236092\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: pure neumann problem modeling in ansys"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ashish,&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the feedback.&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is no dirichlet bc&#8217;s(temperature) for this problem. The idea was to simulate the pure neumann problem as in that example 4.8 using the additional constraint condition. If there is a dirichlet(temperature), there is no issue with the solvability.&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was wondering if there is a any issue with modeling using the combin14 at the boundary where i specify non-zero flux and satify the constraint condition.&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vinod&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-236092","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/236092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/236092\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}