


{"id":235343,"date":"2022-09-15T12:18:16","date_gmt":"2022-09-15T12:18:16","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/235343\/"},"modified":"2022-09-15T12:18:16","modified_gmt":"2022-09-15T12:18:16","slug":"235343","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/235343\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Oilflow pathlines get aborted"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for clarifying, I was looking there. Try doing a DPM plot (just create a dummy injection) and see how that behaves. We switched to &#8220;high-res tracking&#8221; as default a couple of versions back. It shouldn&#8217;t matter, but&#8230;.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve not seen anyone else report poor behaviour from the oilflow pathlines.&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Re the version. The case is (sometimes, depends on zip\/format &amp; RAM) human readable and the saved version is there, with .cas it was at the top, you&#8217;ll need to search for &#8220;fluent&#8221; in the .cas.h5 format.&nbsp;&lt;\/p&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-235343","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/235343","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/235343\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}