{"id":205827,"date":"2022-02-17T17:10:04","date_gmt":"2022-02-17T17:10:04","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/"},"modified":"2022-02-17T17:16:14","modified_gmt":"2022-02-17T17:16:14","slug":"205827","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\nThanks, Rob for your answer<br \/>\n Thanks, I am getting the logical answer when I use the Pressure based solver for the air, I still got some higher Mach number in the pipe inlet, any suggestion, it may be due to the meshing. B<i>ut <\/i>the manual clearly differentiates the use of a pressure-based solver for the incompressible fluid, the thing, here is the thing that during the project extension, I would like to use the PR other gas EOS in the future, I am not sure if I can still use the Pressure Based solver. Any comment on that. <br \/>\n<strong>When I tried to use the density of the air to be computed using the ideal gas, using the pressure-based solver.<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>Solver Error<\/strong> : &#8220;<br \/>\nError: Error occurred during handling message in WorkBench: An error occurred in FLUENT during the execution of an internal command. An error occurred in FLUENT during the execution of an internal command<br \/>\nError Object: #fiter continuity x-velocity y-velocity z-velocity energy time\/iter<br \/>\n1 1.0000e+00 3.1098e-02 2.7651e-02 2.8384e-02 5.7729e-02 0:00:16 249<br \/>\n2 1.0000e+00 3.0083e-01 4.4546e-02 4.1878e-02 5.0551e-03 0:00:12 248<br \/>\n# Divergence detected in AMG for temperature: protective actions enabled!<br \/>\n# Divergence detected in AMG for temperature, temporarily solve with BCGSTAB!<br \/>\n3 1.0000e+00 1.6083e-01 3.3575e-02 3.2518e-02 1.1364e-02 0:00:10 247&#8243;<br \/>\nYes, I think there will be Jetting from the inlet pipe the passage is very small. I think the jetting velocity will be increased due to the large pressure gradient up to 1500 psi.  There are obstacles in the big cross-sectional area but I am initially doing the flow analysis without it in order to understand to simplify the problem and air as sample fluid. <\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/forum-uploads\/549\/KRA3ZJ5CEF26.png\" width=\"946\" height=\"473\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-205827","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Thanks, Rob for your answer Thanks, I am getting the logical answer when I use the Pressure based solver for the air, I still got some higher Mach number in the pipe inlet, any suggestion, it may be due to the meshing. But the manual clearly differentiates the use of a pressure-based solver for the\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow. | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Thanks, Rob for your answer Thanks, I am getting the logical answer when I use the Pressure based solver for the air, I still got some higher Mach number in the pipe inlet, any suggestion, it may be due to the meshing. But the manual clearly differentiates the use of a pressure-based solver for the\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/forum-uploads\/549\/KRA3ZJ5CEF26.png\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:secure_url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/forum-uploads\/549\/KRA3ZJ5CEF26.png\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-02-17T17:10:04+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-02-17T17:16:14+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow. | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Thanks, Rob for your answer Thanks, I am getting the logical answer when I use the Pressure based solver for the air, I still got some higher Mach number in the pipe inlet, any suggestion, it may be due to the meshing. But the manual clearly differentiates the use of a pressure-based solver for the\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/forum-uploads\/549\/KRA3ZJ5CEF26.png\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/205827\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/205827\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow.\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/205827\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow.\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/205827\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/205827\\\/\",\"name\":\"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow. | Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Thanks, Rob for your answer Thanks, I am getting the logical answer when I use the Pressure based solver for the air, I still got some higher Mach number in the pipe inlet, any suggestion, it may be due to the meshing. But the manual clearly differentiates the use of a pressure-based solver for the\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/205827\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-17T17:10:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-02-17T17:16:14+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow. | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Thanks, Rob for your answer Thanks, I am getting the logical answer when I use the Pressure based solver for the air, I still got some higher Mach number in the pipe inlet, any suggestion, it may be due to the meshing. But the manual clearly differentiates the use of a pressure-based solver for the","canonical_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/#listItem","name":"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow."}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow.","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","name":"Home"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/","name":"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow. | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Thanks, Rob for your answer Thanks, I am getting the logical answer when I use the Pressure based solver for the air, I still got some higher Mach number in the pipe inlet, any suggestion, it may be due to the meshing. But the manual clearly differentiates the use of a pressure-based solver for the","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2022-02-17T17:10:04+00:00","dateModified":"2022-02-17T17:16:14+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space","og:type":"article","og:title":"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow. | Ansys Learning Forum","og:description":"Thanks, Rob for your answer Thanks, I am getting the logical answer when I use the Pressure based solver for the air, I still got some higher Mach number in the pipe inlet, any suggestion, it may be due to the meshing. But the manual clearly differentiates the use of a pressure-based solver for the","og:url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/","og:image":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/forum-uploads\/549\/KRA3ZJ5CEF26.png","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/forum-uploads\/549\/KRA3ZJ5CEF26.png","article:published_time":"2022-02-17T17:10:04+00:00","article:modified_time":"2022-02-17T17:16:14+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow. | Ansys Learning Forum","twitter:description":"Thanks, Rob for your answer Thanks, I am getting the logical answer when I use the Pressure based solver for the air, I still got some higher Mach number in the pipe inlet, any suggestion, it may be due to the meshing. But the manual clearly differentiates the use of a pressure-based solver for the","twitter:image":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forum\/wp-content\/uploads\/forum-uploads\/549\/KRA3ZJ5CEF26.png"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"205827","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"content","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":true,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2024-10-26 07:13:41","updated":"2026-08-31 21:57:49","ai":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tReply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow.\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum"},{"label":"Reply To: high Temperature shoot up and high mach flow.","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/205827\/"}],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/205827","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/205827\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205827"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}