{"id":196296,"date":"2021-10-29T23:12:45","date_gmt":"2021-10-29T23:12:45","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/196296\/"},"modified":"2021-10-29T23:12:45","modified_gmt":"2021-10-29T23:12:45","slug":"196296","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/196296\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: EME with CVCS for taper; number of subcells"},"content":{"rendered":"

It can be difficult to have a rule of thumb, since different people may have different expectations for the result and accuracy. My suggestion is to check the overlap of the first few propagation modes. If the overlap is close to 1, it is better. If it is small, such as 0.8 or smaller, it may indicate that more subcells are needed. Of course there is no clear criterion for the smallness, and we do not know how the overlap directly affect the results. You also need to check the current result. If abs(S21) has reached above 0.99, the transmission is quite high in my opinion.<\/p>\n

If you want to investigate more, please refer those links:
\nEME Convergence Testing – An Intuitive Approach<\/a>
\nConvergence testing process for EME simulations<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-196296","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t