{"id":185054,"date":"2021-07-21T16:56:03","date_gmt":"2021-07-21T16:56:03","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/"},"modified":"2021-07-21T16:56:03","modified_gmt":"2021-07-21T16:56:03","slug":"185054","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Many thanks for your help as reducing the nodes solved the problem. But I have one question, when I used 100 substeps it leads to convergence failure as according to the solver there was too much penetration at contact points Ansys. But reducing the no. of substeps to 10 converged it. So, will using less no. of substeps give accurate Stresses and deformation in the model?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-185054","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Many thanks for your help as reducing the nodes solved the problem. But I have one question, when I used 100 substeps it leads to convergence failure as according to the solver there was too much penetration at contact points Ansys. But reducing the no. of substeps to 10 converged it. So, will using less\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Many thanks for your help as reducing the nodes solved the problem. But I have one question, when I used 100 substeps it leads to convergence failure as according to the solver there was too much penetration at contact points Ansys. But reducing the no. of substeps to 10 converged it. So, will using less\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-21T16:56:03+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-21T16:56:03+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement | Ansys Learning Forum\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Many thanks for your help as reducing the nodes solved the problem. But I have one question, when I used 100 substeps it leads to convergence failure as according to the solver there was too much penetration at contact points Ansys. But reducing the no. of substeps to 10 converged it. So, will using less\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/185054\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/185054\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/185054\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/185054\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/185054\\\/\",\"name\":\"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement | Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Many thanks for your help as reducing the nodes solved the problem. But I have one question, when I used 100 substeps it leads to convergence failure as according to the solver there was too much penetration at contact points Ansys. But reducing the no. of substeps to 10 converged it. So, will using less\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/forums\\\/reply\\\/185054\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-21T16:56:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-21T16:56:03+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ansys Learning Forum\",\"description\":\"Ansys Innovation Space\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/innovationspace.ansys.com\\\/forum\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Many thanks for your help as reducing the nodes solved the problem. But I have one question, when I used 100 substeps it leads to convergence failure as according to the solver there was too much penetration at contact points Ansys. But reducing the no. of substeps to 10 converged it. So, will using less","canonical_url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/#listItem","name":"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum#listItem","name":"Home"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/","name":"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement | Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Many thanks for your help as reducing the nodes solved the problem. But I have one question, when I used 100 substeps it leads to convergence failure as according to the solver there was too much penetration at contact points Ansys. But reducing the no. of substeps to 10 converged it. So, will using less","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/#breadcrumblist"},"datePublished":"2021-07-21T16:56:03+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-21T16:56:03+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#website","url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/","name":"Ansys Learning Forum","description":"Ansys Innovation Space","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Ansys Learning Forum | Ansys Innovation Space","og:type":"article","og:title":"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement | Ansys Learning Forum","og:description":"Many thanks for your help as reducing the nodes solved the problem. But I have one question, when I used 100 substeps it leads to convergence failure as according to the solver there was too much penetration at contact points Ansys. But reducing the no. of substeps to 10 converged it. So, will using less","og:url":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/","article:published_time":"2021-07-21T16:56:03+00:00","article:modified_time":"2021-07-21T16:56:03+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement | Ansys Learning Forum","twitter:description":"Many thanks for your help as reducing the nodes solved the problem. But I have one question, when I used 100 substeps it leads to convergence failure as according to the solver there was too much penetration at contact points Ansys. But reducing the no. of substeps to 10 converged it. So, will using less"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"185054","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":null,"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"content","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":null,"og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":true,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":null,"robots_max_videopreview":null,"robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":null,"local_seo":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"created":"2024-10-24 00:44:22","updated":"2026-09-08 12:14:27","ai":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tReply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum"},{"label":"Reply To: Mathematical model stuck at 1% with a warning of remote displacement","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/185054\/"}],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/185054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/185054\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}