{"id":175960,"date":"2020-08-17T14:03:04","date_gmt":"2020-08-17T14:03:04","guid":{"rendered":"\/forum\/forums\/reply\/175960\/"},"modified":"2020-08-17T14:03:04","modified_gmt":"2020-08-17T14:03:04","slug":"175960","status":"publish","type":"reply","link":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/forums\/reply\/175960\/","title":{"rendered":"Reply To: Take buoyancy into consideration for submarine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Without operating density input Solver will automatically parse it with data from the case and that data might be wrong depending on flow\/material properties. <br \/>\nIf you put it now to zero then you need to adjust all openings pressure: pressure inlet and outlets as they now require Absolute Pressure Input taking into account the hydro-static pressure.<br \/>\nIt is not wrong to use steady if the flow is steady and no transient effects need to be tracked. IF you are doing a multiphase run for your submarine then probably you require unsteady solver<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-175960","reply","type-reply","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/175960","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reply"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/replies\/175960\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/innovationspace.ansys.com\/forum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}