Francesco Miccoli
Subscriber

Thank you for the reply. Unfortunately the results still do not make sense.
Consider that the defined film coefficient I defined (bartz) has a peak for a value of X of around 0.5 of the total lenght, the same goes for the bulk temperature (bulk). With this input data I would expect the peak temperature to be at around 0.5 of the lenght and drop significantly after that, but the result I get is very incosistent with this. For this reason I think there is some problem with the definition of either the loads or of the TABLEs.