We’re putting the final touches on our new badges platform. Badge issuance remains temporarily paused, but all completions are being recorded and will be fulfilled once the platform is live. Thank you for your patience.

Ansys Learning Forum Forums Discuss Simulation General Mechanical AQWA Eigenvalue vs Free Decay Test Resulting in Different Heave Natural Period? Reply To: AQWA Eigenvalue vs Free Decay Test Resulting in Different Heave Natural Period?

riyanto.r
Subscriber

Hi Mike, thank you for your clear explanation! I am surprised that AQWA can process the non-linear stiffness from the structure; I should read the documentation more deeply! 

However, I have several follow-up questions:

  1. How can the solver get the non-linear hydrostatic stiffness above the waterline of the structure if we only included the wetted area during the hydro-diffraction analysis? I excluded the freeboard structure above the waterline (to avoid error). Is there any setting(s) that I should have included here?
  2. During the time-domain analysis of the no-wave decay test, how does the solver calculate the added mass & damping ratio? Is this term fixed? Therefore they read the added mass coefficient from the diffraction analysis at its respective natural period? Because added mass & damping is dependent on the wave period. I would like to know what coefficient the solver chose if no wave is included in the simulation. 

Thank you!
Danu Riyanto